<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And you thought art wasn&#8217;t selling online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html</link>
	<description>for the Business of Being an Artist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:18:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison Jean Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html/comment-page-1#comment-2351</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Jean Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html#comment-2351</guid>
		<description>Quote: Ms. McLeod said [...] “In this business supply is always the problem, not demand,”  I guess this is the rate of supply from a few select artists?  All I&#039;ve ever herd is that there are way more art and artists than buyers, not the other way around!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Ms. McLeod said [...] “In this business supply is always the problem, not demand,”  I guess this is the rate of supply from a few select artists?  All I&#8217;ve ever herd is that there are way more art and artists than buyers, not the other way around!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyson B. Stanfield</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html/comment-page-1#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyson B. Stanfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html#comment-2350</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jul. I&#039;ll try that!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jul. I&#8217;ll try that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html/comment-page-1#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;www.quiltnational.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Quilt National&lt;/a&gt; is doing something similar this year.  Not just with the work in the show but also with pieces that were not juried into the show but received a high score during jurying. The website will only be available to a small group of collectors that purchased work from previous shows.   Artists had the option of potentially participating in this website when they entered the show.  Although noone outside of the QN organizers know who&#039;s work is included on the website.   It will be interesting to see how this effects the show sales. Will there be more sales?  Or will there be fewer show sales because there is more competition from the work that didn&#039;t make it into the show?  My pieces has sold during the opening the last 2 shows.  This year I&#039;m hoping my piece sells before hand!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="www.quiltnational.com" rel="nofollow">Quilt National</a> is doing something similar this year.  Not just with the work in the show but also with pieces that were not juried into the show but received a high score during jurying. The website will only be available to a small group of collectors that purchased work from previous shows.   Artists had the option of potentially participating in this website when they entered the show.  Although noone outside of the QN organizers know who&#8217;s work is included on the website.   It will be interesting to see how this effects the show sales. Will there be more sales?  Or will there be fewer show sales because there is more competition from the work that didn&#8217;t make it into the show?  My pieces has sold during the opening the last 2 shows.  This year I&#8217;m hoping my piece sells before hand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Richmond</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html/comment-page-1#comment-2348</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html#comment-2348</guid>
		<description>This definitely seems to be more and more true even here on the Cape where the galleries are very active but not exactly NYC. Many times a gallery show goes up with all the paintings sold before the opening, a fact which is frustrating many old school collectors. In reference to the above comment, many artists who are not well known are selling a lot of work online. It&#039;s incredible exposure. It may take a while for someone really new but people do find you if you have what they want, good keywords, etc. And that&#039;s without a gallery promoting your sales! Totally off subject--I did not receive my email newsletter this week as usual. Do I need to sign up again with your new format? Not a problem if I do--just checking. Thought I might not be alone...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This definitely seems to be more and more true even here on the Cape where the galleries are very active but not exactly NYC. Many times a gallery show goes up with all the paintings sold before the opening, a fact which is frustrating many old school collectors. In reference to the above comment, many artists who are not well known are selling a lot of work online. It&#8217;s incredible exposure. It may take a while for someone really new but people do find you if you have what they want, good keywords, etc. And that&#8217;s without a gallery promoting your sales! Totally off subject&#8211;I did not receive my email newsletter this week as usual. Do I need to sign up again with your new format? Not a problem if I do&#8211;just checking. Thought I might not be alone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMichael</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html/comment-page-1#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMichael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>Ok, I tried all of this and it doesn&#039;t work for individual, emerging artists. I can understand if a well-established gallery with a solid clientele would do it, that might work well for them. (I&#039;m sure they all try it, with varying degrees of success). But to sell out a show before an opening, you need a well-known, well-publisized artist, a quality gallery, and the work has to be priced just right.  But a sellout of this nature is extremely rare.     In my opinion this article doesn&#039;t apply to the millions of artists out there struggling to get noticed. They can try these things, but don&#039;t expect much.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I tried all of this and it doesn&#8217;t work for individual, emerging artists. I can understand if a well-established gallery with a solid clientele would do it, that might work well for them. (I&#8217;m sure they all try it, with varying degrees of success). But to sell out a show before an opening, you need a well-known, well-publisized artist, a quality gallery, and the work has to be priced just right.  But a sellout of this nature is extremely rare.     In my opinion this article doesn&#8217;t apply to the millions of artists out there struggling to get noticed. They can try these things, but don&#8217;t expect much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jul</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html/comment-page-1#comment-2346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/02/and-you-thought-art-wasnt-selling-online.html#comment-2346</guid>
		<description>Check out this New York Times permalink generator for linking to articles: http://nytimes.blogspace.com/genlink  I use it all the time on my blogs. Very handy! The permalink for the article you mention is http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/arts/design/04fink.html?ex=1328245200&amp;en=127390592aa83574&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss  By the way, great article!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this New York Times permalink generator for linking to articles: <a href="http://nytimes.blogspace.com/genlink" rel="nofollow">http://nytimes.blogspace.com/genlink</a>  I use it all the time on my blogs. Very handy! The permalink for the article you mention is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/arts/design/04fink.html?ex=1328245200&#038;en=127390592aa83574&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/arts/design/04fink.html?ex=1328245200&#038;en=127390592aa83574&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss</a>  By the way, great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

