<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Treat your art like it belongs in a museum [part 1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/07/treat-your-art-like-it-belongs-in-a-museum-part-1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/07/treat-your-art-like-it-belongs-in-a-museum-part-1.html</link>
	<description>for the Business of Being an Artist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:18:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Klahn</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/07/treat-your-art-like-it-belongs-in-a-museum-part-1.html/comment-page-1#comment-3636</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Klahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/2007/07/treat-your-art-like-it-belongs-in-a-museum-part-1.html#comment-3636</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with treating one&#039;s art as if will be in the museum.  Use archival materials and don&#039;t frame what you wish wouldn&#039;t show up at the museum. I wonder, though, if the museum serving the public isn&#039;t very close to serving the artist.  It seems to me that the artist wants his art to be collected, preserved and shown.  I am particularly interested in the changes at some museums from a target mission of collecting/archiving to one of the traveling show.  I know of one that sold off collections of local art in order to afford participation in traveling exhibits. Opinions?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with treating one&#8217;s art as if will be in the museum.  Use archival materials and don&#8217;t frame what you wish wouldn&#8217;t show up at the museum. I wonder, though, if the museum serving the public isn&#8217;t very close to serving the artist.  It seems to me that the artist wants his art to be collected, preserved and shown.  I am particularly interested in the changes at some museums from a target mission of collecting/archiving to one of the traveling show.  I know of one that sold off collections of local art in order to afford participation in traveling exhibits. Opinions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

