<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asking for links the wrong way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artbizblog.com/2008/07/asking-for-links-the-wrong-way.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2008/07/asking-for-links-the-wrong-way.html</link>
	<description>for the Business of Being an Artist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:18:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julianne Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2008/07/asking-for-links-the-wrong-way.html/comment-page-1#comment-5968</link>
		<dc:creator>Julianne Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/2008/07/asking-for-links-the-wrong-way.html#comment-5968</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree with you more!! I even thought your email was not only well thought out, but even gentle in responding to what I felt was an attempt-no, more like a &quot;hustle for links&quot; strategy. Is that even a phrase? Ha.  I never ask to &quot;get a link.&quot; Instead, I ask if I may put their link on my list of recommended blogs/sites. I say that I prefer to just &quot;ask&quot; first. And you know what? I usually get a friendly link exchange anyway, as well as cultivating and broadening my community of fellow artists and friends. Just a thought. Julianne www.colorspeaker.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more!! I even thought your email was not only well thought out, but even gentle in responding to what I felt was an attempt-no, more like a &#8220;hustle for links&#8221; strategy. Is that even a phrase? Ha.  I never ask to &#8220;get a link.&#8221; Instead, I ask if I may put their link on my list of recommended blogs/sites. I say that I prefer to just &#8220;ask&#8221; first. And you know what? I usually get a friendly link exchange anyway, as well as cultivating and broadening my community of fellow artists and friends. Just a thought. Julianne <a href="http://www.colorspeaker.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.colorspeaker.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine Tyrrell</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2008/07/asking-for-links-the-wrong-way.html/comment-page-1#comment-5967</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Tyrrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/2008/07/asking-for-links-the-wrong-way.html#comment-5967</guid>
		<description>Alyson - that&#039;s a very generous and tactful response.   If I get an email from somebody who&#039;s apparently behaving in an ignorant fashion then I might well write to them.  Otherwise, I&#039;m with Barbara - I mark it as spam (to help with the spam filters) and move on quickly.  I think you&#039;ve highlighted really clearly in your written response the sorts of issues to think about when responding to people who spam.    I agree, there&#039;s absolutely nothing wrong with adding links to websites or blogs which are commercial, however IMO they must earn respect and &#039;street cred&#039; first - and that really only comes with time. Too many people want to skip this bit and go for the &#039;jump start&#039;!  I added my link to ArtBiz Blog because I liked what I read over a period of time - and not because anybody asked me to.    I&#039;ve tried to provide some signposts for people like this.  I&#039;ve got a blogroll policy (re links) which is very clearly marked (in the &quot;For Your Information&quot; section of my side column).  It starts, in a rather direct fashion.  &quot;I don&#039;t swop links – period. Don&#039;t ask.&quot;.  I did have it lower and said it more politely but I found it worked a lot better said simply and at the top!  I then reiterate the same point in my notes on blogging etiquette in the same section.  For those who do want to get news out, I prefer an approach which announces the site and asks if you&#039;d start reading it, or keep it under review - and no more.  That&#039;s a much better way of getting my attention - and one which doesn&#039;t get marked up as spam.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alyson &#8211; that&#8217;s a very generous and tactful response.   If I get an email from somebody who&#8217;s apparently behaving in an ignorant fashion then I might well write to them.  Otherwise, I&#8217;m with Barbara &#8211; I mark it as spam (to help with the spam filters) and move on quickly.  I think you&#8217;ve highlighted really clearly in your written response the sorts of issues to think about when responding to people who spam.    I agree, there&#8217;s absolutely nothing wrong with adding links to websites or blogs which are commercial, however IMO they must earn respect and &#8216;street cred&#8217; first &#8211; and that really only comes with time. Too many people want to skip this bit and go for the &#8216;jump start&#8217;!  I added my link to ArtBiz Blog because I liked what I read over a period of time &#8211; and not because anybody asked me to.    I&#8217;ve tried to provide some signposts for people like this.  I&#8217;ve got a blogroll policy (re links) which is very clearly marked (in the &#8220;For Your Information&#8221; section of my side column).  It starts, in a rather direct fashion.  &#8220;I don&#8217;t swop links – period. Don&#8217;t ask.&#8221;.  I did have it lower and said it more politely but I found it worked a lot better said simply and at the top!  I then reiterate the same point in my notes on blogging etiquette in the same section.  For those who do want to get news out, I prefer an approach which announces the site and asks if you&#8217;d start reading it, or keep it under review &#8211; and no more.  That&#8217;s a much better way of getting my attention &#8211; and one which doesn&#8217;t get marked up as spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara J Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2008/07/asking-for-links-the-wrong-way.html/comment-page-1#comment-5966</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara J Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/2008/07/asking-for-links-the-wrong-way.html#comment-5966</guid>
		<description>I just got something like that from a &quot;fellow artist&quot;. Asking me to check out their site, etc. But not addressed to me by name. Whoops! Into the spam pile it went.  Your response is very kind and helpful. I won&#039;t go to the trouble. I just tag &#039;em as spammers and move on.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got something like that from a &#8220;fellow artist&#8221;. Asking me to check out their site, etc. But not addressed to me by name. Whoops! Into the spam pile it went.  Your response is very kind and helpful. I won&#8217;t go to the trouble. I just tag &#8216;em as spammers and move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

