<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deep Thought Thursday: Dating artwork on the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html</link>
	<description>for the Business of Being an Artist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:18:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html/comment-page-1#comment-16483</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/?p=5310#comment-16483</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t put the date on my work online because I think it&#039;s irrelevant. Nor do I put the date on the painting itself. Although, my work sells fairly quickly, I still have a few older pieces available. If the work lives up to my standards, it&#039;s on my website and available for purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t put the date on my work online because I think it&#8217;s irrelevant. Nor do I put the date on the painting itself. Although, my work sells fairly quickly, I still have a few older pieces available. If the work lives up to my standards, it&#8217;s on my website and available for purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabrizio Van Marciano</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html/comment-page-1#comment-16472</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabrizio Van Marciano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/?p=5310#comment-16472</guid>
		<description>Ive personally found that my newer pieces sell a lot faster than older ones. This may be because improvemnets were made in newer pieces where they are not so visible in older ones, I&#039;m not sure. However this also depends on the nature of the work such as colour, theme, meaning. This doesn&#039;t stop me from dating any of my work, never thought that it would be such a great issue. Great point though thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive personally found that my newer pieces sell a lot faster than older ones. This may be because improvemnets were made in newer pieces where they are not so visible in older ones, I&#8217;m not sure. However this also depends on the nature of the work such as colour, theme, meaning. This doesn&#8217;t stop me from dating any of my work, never thought that it would be such a great issue. Great point though thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April Field</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html/comment-page-1#comment-16467</link>
		<dc:creator>April Field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/?p=5310#comment-16467</guid>
		<description>personally I&#039;d prefer to see both new and old works.  I don&#039;t have a website myself yet, but I think that as a viewer, that if there are only old works, then the site might seem dated, or like the artist hasn&#039;t been productive in recent years.  But, if there are only new works, then I wouldn&#039;t have any knowledge of their progression as an artist, which is always a good thing to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally I&#8217;d prefer to see both new and old works.  I don&#8217;t have a website myself yet, but I think that as a viewer, that if there are only old works, then the site might seem dated, or like the artist hasn&#8217;t been productive in recent years.  But, if there are only new works, then I wouldn&#8217;t have any knowledge of their progression as an artist, which is always a good thing to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darla Dixon</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html/comment-page-1#comment-16459</link>
		<dc:creator>Darla Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/?p=5310#comment-16459</guid>
		<description>It really is a non-issue for me...but if something I did a long time ago isn&#039;t as good as recent works, I would want to mention it&#039;s older or put the date on it. But in most cases, if the art isn&#039;t good, I wouldn&#039;t want to show it online anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is a non-issue for me&#8230;but if something I did a long time ago isn&#8217;t as good as recent works, I would want to mention it&#8217;s older or put the date on it. But in most cases, if the art isn&#8217;t good, I wouldn&#8217;t want to show it online anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia C Vener</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html/comment-page-1#comment-16458</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia C Vener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/?p=5310#comment-16458</guid>
		<description>Wow, I must be really out of the loop, it never occurred to me that there was anything positive or negative about putting a date with one&#039;s work online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I must be really out of the loop, it never occurred to me that there was anything positive or negative about putting a date with one&#8217;s work online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Eskridge</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html/comment-page-1#comment-16455</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Eskridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/?p=5310#comment-16455</guid>
		<description>I just sold a painting of mine that I did 12 years ago. I find that people generally don&#039;t care when it was made. If the piece speaks to them, it speaks to them and they must have it.

However, I would agree with others in that the caveat is you should have current work as well. As a collector of art myself, I find it disappointing when an artist&#039;s website or online work was last updated 3 or 4 years ago. I might love a piece of art from years ago, but if they aren&#039;t currently active it&#039;s a turn off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just sold a painting of mine that I did 12 years ago. I find that people generally don&#8217;t care when it was made. If the piece speaks to them, it speaks to them and they must have it.</p>
<p>However, I would agree with others in that the caveat is you should have current work as well. As a collector of art myself, I find it disappointing when an artist&#8217;s website or online work was last updated 3 or 4 years ago. I might love a piece of art from years ago, but if they aren&#8217;t currently active it&#8217;s a turn off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darla Dixon</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html/comment-page-1#comment-16454</link>
		<dc:creator>Darla Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/?p=5310#comment-16454</guid>
		<description>I think when it&#039;s a piece I&#039;ve done that I no longer have (a piece of art that was done by commission, for example), then the date is fine. It does seem to matter if it&#039;s a work that&#039;s currently available for sale. I think the perception would be, if it&#039;s 2010 now, and the artwork is from 2003, then for 7 years, nobody bought the artwork, so even if the viewer really likes it, they&#039;re going to have a kind of second guessing of their own good taste in their mind. If nobody else liked it, then maybe, they think, that they shouldn&#039;t get it either...there&#039;s less demand for that piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think when it&#8217;s a piece I&#8217;ve done that I no longer have (a piece of art that was done by commission, for example), then the date is fine. It does seem to matter if it&#8217;s a work that&#8217;s currently available for sale. I think the perception would be, if it&#8217;s 2010 now, and the artwork is from 2003, then for 7 years, nobody bought the artwork, so even if the viewer really likes it, they&#8217;re going to have a kind of second guessing of their own good taste in their mind. If nobody else liked it, then maybe, they think, that they shouldn&#8217;t get it either&#8230;there&#8217;s less demand for that piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Brophy</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html/comment-page-1#comment-16449</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Brophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/?p=5310#comment-16449</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice to see the progression of an artist from one point in time to another.  I agree Rhomany that it doesn&#039;t matter if you have old works shown, as long as there are new ones, too.  Keeping the website fresh and updated solves the problem of &quot;old&quot; and &quot;outdated.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to see the progression of an artist from one point in time to another.  I agree Rhomany that it doesn&#8217;t matter if you have old works shown, as long as there are new ones, too.  Keeping the website fresh and updated solves the problem of &#8220;old&#8221; and &#8220;outdated.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html/comment-page-1#comment-16448</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/?p=5310#comment-16448</guid>
		<description>A lot of people have not seen my art at all so I have a mix of old and new works online, all dated underneath with the copyright. As Rhomany says it shows progression in the development of your style. 

My preference in a &#039;perfect world&#039; would be to only have new work online but currently that is not possible. I am, however, working towards the goal of just showing new pieces as it is important to keep a blog or website looking fresh all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people have not seen my art at all so I have a mix of old and new works online, all dated underneath with the copyright. As Rhomany says it shows progression in the development of your style. </p>
<p>My preference in a &#8216;perfect world&#8217; would be to only have new work online but currently that is not possible. I am, however, working towards the goal of just showing new pieces as it is important to keep a blog or website looking fresh all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhomany</title>
		<link>http://www.artbizblog.com/2010/01/dating.html/comment-page-1#comment-16445</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhomany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artbizblog.com/?p=5310#comment-16445</guid>
		<description>I agree with Nina. Plus, a lot of people like to see the progression. There&#039;s a reason art collectors go after &#039;early works&#039; of the masters.
I suppose some people might see it in a bad light if you&#039;re touting work from years ago and nothing new, but in general the body of work showing the growth of the artist is sought after or a piece that says something to the onwer. Age is largely irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Nina. Plus, a lot of people like to see the progression. There&#8217;s a reason art collectors go after &#8216;early works&#8217; of the masters.<br />
I suppose some people might see it in a bad light if you&#8217;re touting work from years ago and nothing new, but in general the body of work showing the growth of the artist is sought after or a piece that says something to the onwer. Age is largely irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

